fractions in the PRD and PT House of Representatives charged that the PRI negotiated in the shadows with the PAN to pass only the Defense Committee's national security law, which grants the president to decide the allocation of military operations.
also found that the PVEM to reform the Executive may, by a decree, declare the suspension of individual rights without consulting the Congress and subject to a protocol defined by him.
The coordinator of the PRD, Armando Rios Piter, said his parliamentary group itself is in favor of a national security law, but not one that favors the military domain. We will insist that dictate the five commissions to which was referred the bill to avoid a Albaz that only serve the interests of the PRI in a dark deal with the PAN.
The deputy coordinator of the PT and member of the Defence Committee, Enrique Ibarra Pedroza (PT), said that the chairmen of committees of Defense, Interior, Public Security, Justice and Human Rights, which is to review the minutes of the Senate have not cited a working meeting, which strengthens the idea that PRI and PAN will try to give Albaz.
not understand the rush of the PRI, and one of our hypotheses is that the currency most visible change is the election of directors of the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE). In itself the presidential system is poor, so let Felipe Calderón to decide for itself the militarization of the country is serious, he said.
Members Escudero Pablo Morales (PVEM), secretary of the Defence Committee, and Teresa Incháustegui (PRD), secretary of the Public Safety Commission warned that the changes introduced by the PRI to the minutes of the Senate opened an avenue for systematic rape and impunity for human rights and individual rights of citizens and social movements by the military. Escudero said that
request a meeting with President National Commission of Human Rights, Raul Plascencia Villanueva, to offer an opinion on how civil liberties affect approved the proposal of the PRI.
As it stands, is a reform impassable because given plenipotentiary powers to a president who likes to rule by decree, and will find it easier to circumvent the restrictions under which the state of emergency and suspension of guarantees established in Articles 29 and 119 of the Constitution, which represents a first step to presidential authoritarianism.
Incháustegui stressed that the project delivered by the chairman of the Committee on Budget-up three weeks ago, Human Rights, Alfonso Navarrete Prida (PRI), is full of contradictions. This is explained in some articles noted that the declaration of risk to the integrity of Mexico does not depend only on the president or violate human rights, but in others it is contradictory.
It is Enrique Ibarra said, put the locks, but you get the keys. Militarization
without
Ríos Piter balances reported on Monday will communicate with their counterparts from PRI and PAN, Francisco Rojas and Josefina Vazquez Mota, to express concerns about a reform that expands the discretion of the President for the use of armed forces and excludes the judicial and legislative branches.
It is a question of approving a law that has balance, not giving leeway to any authority to act and violates human rights, or leave the Army and Navy decisions as important as national security, he said.
Monday reported that the working group made up of the Political Coordination Board will meet at 11 am to receive the views of the benches on the PRI project.
However, we are concerned that the PRI has to approve the opinion by force and only in the Defence Committee, which stresses the military court reform, he said.
Incháustegui Teresa said that in the comments presented today highlights the fact that the reform was intended to give the Executive the allocation holder to be almost exclusively responsible for national security and leaves out the other powers.
added that the draft document promotes confusion and therefore opens the door to the discretion. For example, he said, it is said that the military would intervene in a declaration of involvement in the document, it says it is not the same as state of emergency, but the Executive may suspend the time you want.
Hence, extended, comes another contradiction: argued that the declaration of involvement to internal security will not be a violation of human rights, but the government can assess the performance of individual rights, such as demonstrations and industrial plants, electoral and political, "can be an 'obstacle' and suffocated by the Army. "
also exposed the degree of challenge on definitions, contingency, obstacle or threat to internal security "is vague, because the four are virtually synonymous, even tautological, and it allows the president or the National Security Council defined how to cope in the shadows, as well information as confidential and shall exclude the Federal Institute of Access to Public Information. "
La Jornada 
0 comments:
Post a Comment